Ulrich Beck vs. Bruno Latour

Screenshot 2014-05-07 10.59.47

A decade ago, Latour and Beck went at it in the pages of Duke University Press’s journal Common Knowledge, writing, arguably, some of the most read material in the modest journal’s history. The topic in question was about peace at a time of advancing cosmopolitanism. After reading the debate, I wonder why it never really “grabbed” STSers the way, for example, that the papers from Collins/Yearly vs. Callon/Latour are seen as a kind of classic “battle royale”?

At any rate, check them out for yourself (in this order):

Beck 2004 “THE TRUTH OF OTHERS: A Cosmopolitan Approach”: (doi: 10.1215/0961754X-10-3-430)

Latour 2005 “WHOSE COSMOS, WHICH COSMOPOLITICS?: Comments on the Peace Terms of Ulrich Beck”: (doi:10.1215/0961754X-10-3-450, the most cited article in Common Knowledge’s history by January 2014)

Beck 2005 “NEITHER ORDER NOR PEACE: A Response to Bruno Latour”: (doi:10.1215/0961754X-11-1-1 )


This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Nicholas. Bookmark the permalink.

About Nicholas

Associate Professor of Sociology, Environmental Studies, and Science and Technology Studies at Penn State, Nicholas mainly writes about understanding the scientific study of states and, thus, it is namely about state theory. Given his training in sociology and STS, he takes a decidedly STS-oriented approach to state theory and issues of governance.

7 thoughts on “Ulrich Beck vs. Bruno Latour

  1. outside of the paywall but so can’t speak to the particulars but haven’t thought of UB as being in the STS family so that may well be part of it, also the topic probably wasn’t at the fore of the field at the time was it? I must say I’m puzzled in general at Bruno’s sudden rise to prominence as I haven’t seen much really new or useful in what he is up to in his pivot into waxing philosophical.


    • paywalls, paywalls! Well, cosmopolitanism is an odd topic in STS; it seems at once relevant, but somehow “too global” for the small case studies that so dominate the general field. That said, Latour has really blossomed, but I think (per insights in his early work) we cannot mistake Bruno the man from the now extremely well-funded, un-edited, un-bounded “thing” that is the Bruno-machine. He must have people working for him and helping him to prepare his work and facilitate so much of these wild activities that he supports.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s