“If anyone else had published the second and third volumes of the History of Sexuality, they would have had little to no impact on the theoretical domains of literary and cultural theory in the U.S. academy.”
Amanda Anderson, 2006, The Way We Argue Now: A Study in the Cultures of Theory. Princeton, Princeton University Press, p. 121.
ha, if one has to choose
I guess “cut off his head” is better than “cut and paste his ideas”
LikeLiked by 1 person
ah they’ve cut&pasted (and generally rehashed) bits&pieces of Foucault without ever really taking on/in the corpus, more idle-chatter/gossip (they, who matter in our social/instiutional circle/clique, say) than denken if you will.
Yes, yes; Foucault said “cut off the king’s head”; who will say “cut off the Foucault’s head?”
Ha, indeed! Well said, well said!
heh, would say they have had little to no impact but point taken, as we’ve been discussing in terms of never been pomo the death of author-ity was more prescriptive (more wishful thinking) than descriptive.